PR18 will establish our outputs and funding for Control Period 6 (CP6) – from 1 April 2019 to 31 March 2024
This page contains our publications related to access charges, including responses and conclusions for relevant consultations. It also includes our responses to Office of Rail and Road's (ORR) PR18 publications.
Indicative PR18 timeline
- Autumn 2016 – rail industry publishes its initial industry plans.
- Spring 2017 – ORR publishes advice to ministers and sets out requirements for Network Rail’s Strategic Business Plan.
- Summer 2017 – Department for Transport (DfT) and Transport Scotland publish their high level output specifications (HLOS) and statements of funds available (SOFA).
- Winter 2018 – Network Rail publishes its strategic business plan.
- Summer 2018 – ORR publishes its draft determination.
- Autumn 2018 – ORR publishes its final determination.
- April 2019 – CP6 begins.
Network Rail publications on PR18
This area sets out our publications as part of PR18. This includes Network Rail consultations and stakeholder responses to these consultations.
Consultation on variable and station charges in CP6
This consultation sets out our proposed approach to recalibrating variable charges and station charges in CP6, and seeks stakeholders’ views on our approach.
We will be consulting separately on our proposed methodology for allocating fixed costs to train operators later this summer.
Please email responses to us by Friday 20 October 2017.
Network Rail consultation on variable and station charges in CP6
To inform our work on cost allocation and attribution, we commissioned Brockley Consulting to advise us on ways to make cost causation more transparent, improving the quality of information available to decision makers.
This report considers approaches to cost allocation for the Great Britain railway network and opportunities to refine these approaches.
Cost allocation report
Brockley Consulting – review of cost attribution and cost allocation approaches (March 2015)618 Kb
On 18 and 26 May 2016, Brockley Consulting presented to stakeholders the emerging findings from Network Rail’s cost allocation pilot study.
Presentation – emerging findings from Network Rail's cost allocation pilot study (May 2016)667 Kb
In June 2016, Brockley Consulting concluded the cost allocation pilot study. The paper, below, describes the modelling approach used and presents the results of this study.
Brockley Consulting – cost allocation study – modelling and results1 Mb
On 3 August 2016, ORR wrote to us to confirm their support for us continuing our cost allocation and attribution work, including extending the analysis to the national level.
Network Rail's cost allocation work – letter to Network Rail137 Kb
On 14 November 2016, Network Rail and Brockley Consulting gave an update to members of the Rail Delivery Group on progress with extending the cost allocation study to cover the whole of Great Britain.
Network Rail and Brockley Consulting cost allocation – GB roll-out – update (November 2016)640 Kb
Cost allocation GB roll-out Initial GB results and next steps (March 2017)741 Kb
ORR publications on PR18
ORR's website contains background information on the periodic review. As PR18 progresses, this page will be updated with more information on objectives, timetables, and stakeholder engagement.
On 14 July 2015, ORR held a workshop to update industry stakeholders on the approach being used to prepare for their consultation on the structure of charges in PR18.
Network Rail responses to ORR consultations
Network Rail's response to ORR Schedule 4 and 8 consultation (January 2016)160 Kb
Network Rail's response to the ORR's letter dated 13 November 2015 inviting input into preparation for reviews of Schedules 4 and 8 of track access contracts for the PR18.
Network Rail's response to ORR call for evidence (February 2016)48 Kb
Network Rail's response to the ORR's letter dated 15 January 2016 calling for evidence from all interested parties in response to the Which? super-complaint submission to ORR concerning passenger compensation arrangements for delayed rail services.
Network Rail's response to ORR's network charges consultation (March 2016)421 Kb
Network Rail's response to the ORR's consultation issued 10 December 2015 on network charges for Control Period 6.
Network Rail's response to ORR's 2018 Periodic Review of Network Rail - initial consultation (August 2016)147 Kb
Network Rail's response to the ORR's consultation issued 18 May 2016 on its proposed priorities, objectives and approach to PR18.
Network Rail's response to ORR's PR18 working paper 1: implementing route-level regulation (September 2016)124 Kb
In June 2016 the ORR issues working papers on the implementing route-level regulation and system operation.
Network Rail's response to ORR's PR18 system operator working papers (September 2016)418 Kb
Network Rail's response to ORR's PR18 working paper 4: outputs framework (September 2016)445 Kb
Network Rail's response to ORR's PR18 working paper 5: options for the treatment of enhancements in PR18 (October 2016)99 Kb
Network Rail’s response to ORR’s consultation on changes to charges and contractual incentives (March 2017)802 Kb
Rail Delivery Group publications
- improving services and delivering better value for money
- providing leadership
- promoting greater co-operation
- short and long term improvements.
RDG’s current work programme spans a number of different areas, one of which is contractual and regulatory reform. RDG’s review of charges is one element of RDG’s work in relation to contractual and regulatory reform.
RDG’s review is designed to enable the rail industry to take a fresh look at how train operators are charged to run trains on our infrastructure. It also considers how our incentives can be better aligned with train operators’ to improve industry outcomes.
We have worked collaboratively with the rest of the industry to support RDG’s work in this area.
The outputs of RDG’s review of charges are set out on this web page. For more information about RDG and its review of charges, please visit the RDG website.
RDG charges and incentives user guide (Phase 1, June 2014)415 Kb
This document provides an overview of the regulatory charges and incentive mechanisms used in the railway industry in Control Period 5.
RDG vision for the charges and incentives regime in the long run (Phase 1, December 2014)290 Kb
RDG set out the background to its review, the context and output of its first phase of work and how this work would be used.
ORR structure of charges letter (December 2014)107 Kb
The ORR wrote to RDG to clarify its proposed approach to its review of the structure of charges for the next periodic review (PR18) and invite comments on that proposal.
RDG response to ORR's letter on the structure of charges (February 2015)322 Kb
RDG assessment of the current charges and incentives regime (Phase 2, May 2015)997 Kb
RDG assessed the extent to which the current charges and incentives regime delivers its vision for the regime in the long run.
RDG current and potential alternative states of the world (Phase 2, May 2015)447 Kb
RDG produced a description of the environment that the charges and incentives regime currently operates within i.e. the current 'state of the world', and developed a range of potential alternative states of the world that may be relevant in the future.
Network Rail's response to ORR's TOC payment rate error letter (October 2015)56 Kb
ORR's letter dated September 2015, 'Error in CP5 Schedule 8 passenger train operator payment rates', sets out the ORR's proposal for addressing an error in the passenger train operator payment rates, made as part of the previous periodic review (PR13). This is Network Rail's response.
Network Rail's response to CMA's consultation on competition in passenger rail services (October 2015)79 Kb
On 17 July 2015 the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) issued a consultation on competition in passenger rail services in Great Britain. This is Network Rail's response.
CMA - Network Rail response to ORR impact assessments (January 2016)45 Kb
On 31 December 2015, ORR published its impact assessments of the CMA's options for increasing on-rail competition. This is Network Rail's response.