Once a line has been designated as a Community Rail line, it can lead to:
• Changes in the way the line is managed with the local community having more say on issues such as fares and timetables if they can show it will improve the financial performance of the service.
• The line being identified as one needing particular attention to review how standards are being implemented and how maintenance is carried out.
• Reinforcing the role of the Community Rail partnership in bringing together local stakeholders in developing the line.
The changes you’ll see Whether it’s through the Community Rail Partnership or the Train Operating Companies (TOC), the benefits of being designated as a Community Rail line or service could include:
• Bespoke solutions for Community Rail lines
• Greater involvement of the local community in the timetable and fares
• Greater local decision-making on connections policies
• Examination of how standards are specified regarding maintenance and renewal of infrastructure, to help put the lines on a sustainable footing for the future
• Making station development easier and cheaper and more appropriate to the local environment
• Minor changes to stations, such as relocation of facilities
• Innovative approaches to providing better disabled access to stations
• Risk-based approach to infrastructure enhancements to find lower cost solutions
• Removal of the requirement for infrastructure to meet European interoperability standards
Changes to how the line is managed Designation could also see an increased focus on promoting the line in the local area and raising its profile both locally and in the railway industry as a whole.
It also encourages train operators, Network Rail, local authorities and the local community to work together to make the most out of opportunities provided by the railway.
It passes more power to TOCs to change timetables and fares in consultation with the community rail partnership and also gives opportunities to flex contractual requirements so they can find more cost-effective ways to deliver the service.
There is no change to the ownership of all infrastructure assets. They remain with Network Rail.
Ownership of the trains will usually be with one of the ROSCOs (rolling stock leasing companies) but designation will encourage a creative approach to this issue where costs can be reduced.
Operation of the stations and trains will generally be by the TOC who holds the franchise in that area. However, a number of different solutions are being considered such as local management or even separate small train operating companies.
Maintenance and renewal of the infrastructure is expected to remain a Network Rail responsibility (other options are being considered) whilst day-to-day maintenance of the stations remains the responsibility of the TOC.
The TOC may decide to sub-contract this activity to a railway development company if this shows cost savings.
The process begins with the production of a simple Route Prospectus which identifies all the constraints and opportunities for the line and which will reflect the local nature of the line.
This is accompanied by a route specification setting out some of the technical issues on the line such as capacity, weight restrictions, loading gauge and defining the limits of the proposed designation.
These documents must be fully aligned with the appropriate Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS) and Route Plans which outline the plans for development and maintenance on the line.
Designation will only be considered where there is an active community rail partnership or railway development company
There are 4 stages to the Community Rail Designation process:
Stage one - declaration of intentions and seeking of views
This will be done by an announcement on the DfT website. This will include an estimate of the date that consultation will take place and a request for short submissions of views to be taken into consideration.
Given that there is already a list of lines being considered for Community Rail designation in the strategy, there is generally no need for a high profile announcement of this part of the process.
Stage two – production of Route Prospectus and Route Specification.
The DfT will produce templated documents based on the information already to hand, existing plans and initiatives likely to be value-for-money, as revealed by Stage One. These will then be sent out for consultation.
Stage three – local consultation
Consultation will take place with the following stakeholders prior to designation:
• County councils, district councils and unitary authorities associated with the line
• Metropolitan borough councils and PTEs served by the line
• The Community Rail partnership (CRP) or railway development company (RDC)
• The Rail Passenger Council (which may also take into consideration the views of any rail user group who are not formal consultees)
• All Train Operating Companies (TOCs) associated with the line
• All Freight Operating Companies (FOCs)
• Network Rail
• ORR
6 weeks will generally be allowed from issue of documentation to closure of the formal consultation.
The local MPs will be informed for the plans, but will not be formal consulates.
Stage four – revision of Route Prospectus and Specification.
The documentation may be revised in the light of the consultation, following consideration by the Community Rail Development Steering Group.
The Secretary of State will be invited to designate the line under the revised documentation. This will not take place unless there is clear local support. DfT Rail Executive Group will make the recommendation to the Secretary of State.
Designation (or rejection of designation) will be confirmed in writing to all consultees.
After designation takes place, it is not expected that this will be reviewed for at least 3 years. If there is a significant demand to review, then the designation process will be repeated as described above.
There is currently a preferred order for future Community Rail designations set by DfT’s Community Rail Development Steering Group.
That order may change if there is a particular requirement to bring a line forward for designation.
Designation brings the opportunity for the partnership (or railway development company) to work on service improvements such as enhancements to stations, changes to the timetable, new fares structures and promotional activity, within the Community Rail framework (and therefore with greater flexibility to deliver change).
This should make changes happen faster and should ensure full involvement of the local community through the partnership.
Designation does not come with any funding but it is hoped that the partnership approach will enable funders to come forward.
No. The intention is to run these lines cost effectively, reducing the drain on taxpayers’ money, not to close them down.
The idea is to find ways that designated lines can be run to standards appropriate to their current levels of rail traffic and that they are appropriately specified for any future development.
The strategy also gives the opportunity for local innovation and for service developments that meet local needs.
ACoRP can supply advice on rail re-openings but this is not something for the faint-hearted! There have been many schemes, but few succeed.
As Network Rail has taken over some of the Strategic Rail Authority’s responsibilities for development of the network, we are the next port of call for any serious enquiries.
If there is a realistic prospect that a line could be re-opened, and the funding to do so is available (Network Rail is not funded for rail re-openings), our Network Planning team would consider the next steps.
Find out how to
contact us
Whilst we’re keen to see the network develop in order to address current and predicted capacity issues, and in order to assist the delivery of government targets on cutting pollution and improving access, it should be noted that in recent years there have been limited successful re-openings on the national network.
There is considerable activity in Scotland and there has been some re-opening in Wales but in England those that have taken place, such as the Wensleydale and Weardale Railways, tend to be in the independent sector.
As with line re-openings, you should not expect a quick result. There are many issues to consider, finance being just one.
Stations have an impact on line capacity (the number of trains that can operate is reduced because of trains stopping at stations), and additional stations on some routes may not be possible.
You also need to consider the effect on the train service. Additional stops will extend journey times, and may increase the number of trains required to operate the service.
Extra passengers require extra seats, so the costs involved may not just be that of the station itself, but of leasing extra rolling stock. A longer journey time may also make the service less attractive to passengers from other stations on the route.
One of the first deliverables that will be required is a feasibility study into the proposal to look at the overall impact on the network, on train services and to demonstrate that there is, or will be, a demand for the station. As the promoter, generally you will need to pay for this study.
Find out how to
contact us